Saving a New Hampshire Treasure

Effingham Commission Supports Proposed Management Plan

The following letter was sent to DRED by the chair of Effingham Conservation Commission on July 8, 2008:

Dear Donald Kent:

At the outset, we at Effingham Conservation Commission wish to let DRED know of our support to Alternative 3 (OLNA beach partially open to public) amongst the three alternatives proposed. To that extent, the Commission would be willing to consider any volunteer help, if called upon. However, the Commission has certain comments and suggestions.

It appears that the OLNA has been used exclusively by a select few, namely some boaters (including Indian Mound residents). We are not sure if that is what was meant by the “recreational” part of the “education and recreational purposes” stipulated in the deeded transfer to DRED. These select few boaters are the ones who have been accessing this beach and not the public at large. Unfortunately, it has also depleted and endangered the natural resources with an unlikely educational outcome.

We congratulate DRED in finally acknowledging this reality and now trying to tread carefully its conflicted mandate of tourism vs. conservation. True, the OLNA is in the town of Ossipee, but its natural resources belong to the state. Hence, protection of the OLNA should be viewed as in state’s interest.

Implementation of Alternative 3 would require changing the use pattern of those who have been misusing it. Wouldn’t it have been better to close the region for one year (2009) and take that opportunity to educate these users? And then slowly open it; say in two years (2010-11) in a suitable fashion under NHNHB advisement.

We are unable to see how allowing the use of the beach will escape the pollution problem, mainly since no toilet facility is proposed. If the use of the beach is allowed to the boaters then facilities (Porta-potty; trash-can) should also be provided to prevent unintended pollution problems.

Finally, since this area is not accessible by other than watercraft, it excludes most individuals from recreation and education. DRED could consider at least the educational aspect by providing information through available means and by conducting some seasonal guided tours. The highest priority should be given to the protection of the natural resources, including the wetlands. Hence, unlike in the past, future recommendations by NHNHB should be considered for implementation. Thanks.

Kamal Nath, Chair; Effingham Conservation Commission

Leave a Response

This is a moderated forum. To improve the chances of seeing your comment posted, say something new and keep it short. Comments that are in bad taste, poorly written or in capital letters will not be approved. We try to publish all comments within a few hours. Please be patient.

Name (Required)

Email (Required but not published)

Website (Optional)